Bush v. Goreis a Supreme Court of the United States case that revolves around Florida’s recount of the presidential election ballots. In this case, petitioner Bush won the 25 electoral votes in Florida - and thus the presidential election - by a narrow margin against respondent Gore. The narrow margin triggered an automatic recount of votes under Florida’s election laws. 1 When the Florida court ruled, the totals for Bush and Gore were then less than 1, votes apart.
One dissent pegged the number of uncounted votes in question atGore v. Harris, supra, __ So. 2d __, (slip op., at 66) (opinion of Harding, J.). Gore’s counsel represented to us that the relevant figure is approximately 60, Tr. of. II, §1–Art. I, §4–in the strained manner put forth in the concurrence. Ante, at 1- 2 and n. 1 (dissenting opinion). The concurrence’s treatment of §5 as “inform [ing]” its interpretation of Article II, §1, cl.
2, ante, at 3 (Rehnquist, C. J., concurring), is no more convincing. The Chief Justice contends that our opinion in Bush v.
Dec 15, By Kyle Teal, The Florida Bar. The St. Thomas University School of Law invited the legal community to revisit one of the United States Supreme Court’s most controversial decisions in a hotly debated November symposium: “ Bush bushleaning.buzz: A Decade Later.” The symposium, held Novemberwas well-attended by an audience of lawyers, students, Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins.
CitationBush v. Gore, U.S. 98 (U.S. ) Brief Fact Summary. George W. Bush sought certiorari under the United States Supreme Court after Al Gore sought a recount of Florida’s electoral votes for the Presidential election.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Where the results of a presidential election are contested, the Equal Protection Clause [ ]. Jun 01, Jun 01, Bush v.
Gore has called the whole conservative story about judicial overreaching into question. Or, Bush v. Gore is being made into the death warrant for judicial conservatism. Either way, it portends a crisis. Liberals said that Clinton's impeachment was a political lynching, shrouded in talk of the founders and Article II. FL supreme court called for a recount of ballots in certain counties- Bush appealed to SCOTUS- ruled and gave Bush the presidency; Critics claim that decision was based more on politics rather than interpretation of the law.
Importance of Bush v. Gore. model where judicial ruling is primarily determined by the case- explain meaning of. Bush v. Gore this case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired.
Apr 03, Gore. Albert Gore; Defendant – Bush v. Gore. Verdict Delivered: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of George W. Bush, explaining that the State of Florida had indeed violated the 14th Amendment upon enacting a recounting procedure not considered to be cogent with the Equal Protection Clause; the Supreme Court maintained that this procedure resulted in the devaluation of the ballots initially set forth. Associated Legislation with regard to Bush v. Gore.